2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1956 Maserati 300
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati 300 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1956 Maserati 300. (242 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 764 kg more than 1956 Maserati 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford GT 40 | 1956 Maserati 300 | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | GT 40 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |
