2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1964 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1964 Ford Falcon. (282 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 820 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Falcon (244 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1964 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford GT 40 | 1964 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | GT 40 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2890 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 244 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 700 kg |