2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1974 Kia Brisa
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1974 Kia Brisa. (64 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1974 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 674 kg more than 1974 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Kia Brisa (92 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1974 Kia Brisa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford GT 40 | 1974 Kia Brisa | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | GT 40 | Brisa |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 846 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2270 mm |