2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 66 (94 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1979 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford GT 40 | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | GT 40 | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1550 mm |