2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 291 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1980 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford GT 40 | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | GT 40 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2530 mm |
