2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 2002 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 2002 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford GT 40 | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | GT 40 | AZ |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2370 mm |