2002 Ford GT 40 vs. 2005 Morgan Aeromax
To start off, 2005 Morgan Aeromax is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Morgan Aeromax is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2005 Morgan Aeromax. (329 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Morgan Aeromax.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Morgan Aeromax (449 Nm) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Morgan Aeromax will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford GT 40 | 2005 Morgan Aeromax | |
| Make | Ford | Morgan |
| Model | GT 40 | Aeromax |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 329 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 449 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 70 L |
