2002 Ford Ka vs. 1952 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Triumph Renown weights approximately 144 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1952 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ka | Renown |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2750 mm |
