2002 Ford Ka vs. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Pontiac Star Chief would be higher. At 4,715 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief (173 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Pontiac Star Chief should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Pontiac Star Chief weights approximately 514 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Pontiac Star Chief is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Pontiac Star Chief. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1954 Pontiac Star Chief | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ka | Star Chief |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4715 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3110 mm |