2002 Ford Ka vs. 1960 Simca Vedette
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Vedette would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 36 kg more than 1960 Simca Vedette.
Because 1960 Simca Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Simca Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1960 Simca Vedette | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Ka | Vedette |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 42 L |
