2002 Ford Ka vs. 1961 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. (56 HP @ 200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 36 kg more than 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Simca Plein Ceil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1961 Simca Plein Ceil | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Ka | Plein Ceil |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 55 L |