2002 Ford Ka vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 274 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | Ka | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 295 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2930 mm |
