2002 Ford Ka vs. 1964 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 206 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | Ka | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 40 L |
