2002 Ford Ka vs. 1965 Renault 4
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1965 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 486 kg more than 1965 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1965 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ka | 4 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |
