2002 Ford Ka vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 154 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ka | Cedric |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |