2002 Ford Ka vs. 1968 Seat 1500
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1968 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Seat 1500 weights approximately 24 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 1968 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1968 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Ka | 1500 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2660 mm |