2002 Ford Ka vs. 1970 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1970 Volkswagen 1600. (49 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1970 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 1970 Volkswagen 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volkswagen 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1970 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Ka | 1600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1640 mm |