2002 Ford Ka vs. 1973 Volvo 145

To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1973 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1973 Volvo 145. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Volvo 145 weights approximately 154 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.

Because 1973 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Volvo 145. (152 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Volvo 145.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Ka 1973 Volvo 145
Make Ford Volvo
Model Ka 145
Year Released 2002 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 1778 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 135 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 175 Nm 152 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1136 kg 1290 kg
Vehicle Length 3660 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2620 mm