2002 Ford Ka vs. 1975 MG MGB
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1975 MG MGB. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1975 MG MGB.
Because 1975 MG MGB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 MG MGB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 MG MGB. (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1975 MG MGB | |
Make | Ford | MG |
Model | Ka | MGB |
Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 80.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |