2002 Ford Ka vs. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1144 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1979 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Ka | Corniche |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3030 mm |