2002 Ford Ka vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 169 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ka | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |