2002 Ford Ka vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 154 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Ka | CJ |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2380 mm |
