2002 Ford Ka vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 186 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (122 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | Ka | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 122 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2400 mm |
