2002 Ford Ka vs. 1986 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1986 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 111 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1986 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ka | Lynx |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2400 mm |