2002 Ford Ka vs. 1987 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 200 kg more than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1987 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ka | Colt |
Year Released | 2002 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2390 mm |