2002 Ford Ka vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ka | Ranger |
Year Released | 2002 | 1990 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4690 mm |