2002 Ford Ka vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1995 Mazda 626. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 119 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda 626. (169 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ka | 626 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |