2002 Ford Ka vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 286 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ka | Pajero |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |