2002 Ford Ka vs. 1997 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercury Villager weights approximately 664 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1997 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Ka | Villager |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2860 mm |