2002 Ford Ka vs. 1997 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 41 kg more than 1997 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 1997 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ka | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |