2002 Ford Ka vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Z would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan Z (245 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1999 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 1999 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ka | Z |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2450 mm |
