2002 Ford Ka vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 201 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ka | Clio |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |
