2002 Ford Ka vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 391 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Ka | Wagon |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2330 mm |