2002 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2004 Mahindra CL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mahindra CL weights approximately 164 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 2004 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 2004 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Ford | Mahindra |
Model | Ka | CL |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |