2002 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 32 kg more than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ka | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 55 L |