2002 Ford Ka vs. 2007 Kia Rondo
To start off, 2007 Kia Rondo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Kia Rondo (162 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia Rondo (222 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2007 Kia Rondo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka. 2007 Kia Rondo has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Kia Rondo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 2007 Kia Rondo | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Ka | Rondo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |