2002 Ford Ka vs. 2009 Volkswagen Touareg

To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Touareg is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Touareg is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Touareg (218 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Touareg should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka.

Because 2009 Volkswagen Touareg is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Touareg will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Touareg (407 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm). This means 2009 Volkswagen Touareg will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka. 2009 Volkswagen Touareg has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volkswagen Touareg will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Ka 2009 Volkswagen Touareg
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Ka Touareg
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Roadster SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 2966 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 135 HP 218 HP
Torque 175 Nm 407 Nm
Top Speed 174 km/hour 209 km/hour
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1910 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.4 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.6 L/100km 13.8 L/100km