2002 Ford Ka vs. 2010 Kia Rondo
To start off, 2010 Kia Rondo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Rondo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Rondo (198 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Rondo should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Rondo weights approximately 149 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Rondo (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Rondo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka. 2010 Kia Rondo has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Rondo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 2010 Kia Rondo | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Ka | Rondo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |