2002 Ford Ka vs. 2011 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 295 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 2011 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Ka | HHR |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1431 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4475 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1603 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2629 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 61 L |
