2002 Ford Ka vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1404 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Ford | Fisker |
| Model | Ka | Karma |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 36 L |
