2002 Ford Ka vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1344 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2002 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2002 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Ka | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Ka | SRX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11.5 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 2480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 80 L |