2002 Ford Ka vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ka would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ka. (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 357 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Z (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Ka | 2013 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ka | Z |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 11:01:00 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1136 kg | 1493 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4246 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1315 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.4 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 72 L |
