2002 Ford Laser vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Laser would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Laser (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2002 Ford Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Laser. (146 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Laser | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Laser | 6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2610 mm |