2002 Ford Lynx vs. 1994 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 Ford Lynx is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 510 kg more than 2002 Ford Lynx.
Because 1994 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Lynx | 1994 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Lynx | Cougar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |