2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 1949 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (144 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 663 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Maserati A6GCS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Maserati A6GCS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mondeo | 1949 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Mondeo | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1283 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |
