2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 1956 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (222 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1956 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1956 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2002 Ford Mondeo.
Because 1956 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mondeo | 1956 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | Mondeo | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1890 mm |
