2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 2002 Ford Mondeo and 1967 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (144 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 113 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (176 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mondeo | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Mondeo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1283 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 64 L |
