2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (144 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (176 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Ford Mondeo | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mondeo | 66 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
