2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 1984 Reliant Scimitar

To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (222 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1984 Reliant Scimitar. (135 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1984 Reliant Scimitar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 241 kg more than 1984 Reliant Scimitar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (280 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Reliant Scimitar. (206 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Reliant Scimitar.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Ford Mondeo 1984 Reliant Scimitar
Make Ford Reliant
Model Mondeo Scimitar
Year Released 2002 1984
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2967 cc 2792 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 222 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 68.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.2:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1506 kg 1265 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 L 27 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]