2002 Ford Mondeo vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2002 Ford Mondeo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mondeo (222 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1994 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 281 kg more than 1994 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Mondeo (280 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Plymouth Colt. (157 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Ford Mondeo | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | Mondeo | Colt |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |